Main results page       Management log-in      

---

QC VS QAC PAIRS - SESSION 2 (15-APR-26)

Pair 4 EW - SUSAN WEBB / FIONA MCINTOSH
Place this match: 7, Percentage: 51.52%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	5: JANE GUTHRIE / NENE TOLLEY	3 E	4C	7	-100	13	59%
Board 2	5: JANE GUTHRIE / NENE TOLLEY	3 S	3S	9	-140	3	14%
Board 3	5: JANE GUTHRIE / NENE TOLLEY	4 W	3D	9	-100	5	23%
Board 4	3: JULIA TIMBS / MEREDITH BROWN	1NT E	2C	8	120	7	32%
Board 5	3: JULIA TIMBS / MEREDITH BROWN	4 N	KS	9	100	15	68%
Board 6	3: JULIA TIMBS / MEREDITH BROWN	3 N	AD	8	50	5	23%
Board 7	6: GILL MILLER / SARAH NICOLSON	2 N	5C	5	300	13	59%
Board 8	6: GILL MILLER / SARAH NICOLSON	2NT N	5D	8	-120	20	91%
Board 9	6: GILL MILLER / SARAH NICOLSON	3 N	KH	10	-130	15	68%
Board 10	1: KATHRYN HARBISON / JULIET BRITTEN-JONES	3NT E	4H	11	660	21	95%
Board 11	1: KATHRYN HARBISON / JULIET BRITTEN-JONES	4 W	AD	9	-50	1	5%
Board 12	1: KATHRYN HARBISON / JULIET BRITTEN-JONES	3 S	AH	8	100	14	64%
Board 13	4: ZINA MEREDITH / JO RAVEN	5 W	TS	11	600	4	18%
Board 14	4: ZINA MEREDITH / JO RAVEN	3NT E	3D	7	-100	2	9%
Board 15	4: ZINA MEREDITH / JO RAVEN	1 S	2H	7	-70	14	64%
Board 16	2: KATE HARTLEY / SUSAN ARMITAGE	3 W	7D	8	-100	14	64%
Board 17	2: KATE HARTLEY / SUSAN ARMITAGE	3 W	4S	10	130	17	77%
Board 18	2: KATE HARTLEY / SUSAN ARMITAGE	3NT W	5H	11	460	21	95%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results     Back to Previous Page